[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#413926: Call for vote: wordpress: Should not ship with Etch

> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: wordpress should not be included in etch due to bug #413269
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: wordpress should be included in etch in spite of bug #413269
> [ 3 ] Choice 3: Further discussion
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

        At this point, I have to decide between the prognostications
 of a security team member, versus the opinions of the debian
 maintainer and upstream's commitment to support.  I tend to also
 consider the maintainers to be domain experts as far as their package
 is concerned, which counters the security team being domain experts
 in security issues and solutions.

        Additionally, lacking specifics, I would tend to let decisions
 of non-bugginess to the point of being unsupportable to lie with the
 maintainers, since they would have to support the package, so I am
 voting the way I did.

It's better to burn out than it is to rust.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Attachment: pgpfVFfytb76S.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: