> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > [ 2 ] Choice 1: wordpress should not be included in etch due to bug #413269 > [ 1 ] Choice 2: wordpress should be included in etch in spite of bug #413269 > [ 3 ] Choice 3: Further discussion > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- At this point, I have to decide between the prognostications of a security team member, versus the opinions of the debian maintainer and upstream's commitment to support. I tend to also consider the maintainers to be domain experts as far as their package is concerned, which counters the security team being domain experts in security issues and solutions. Additionally, lacking specifics, I would tend to let decisions of non-bugginess to the point of being unsupportable to lie with the maintainers, since they would have to support the package, so I am voting the way I did. manoj -- It's better to burn out than it is to rust. Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Attachment:
pgpfVFfytb76S.pgp
Description: PGP signature