Steve Langasek ha scritto: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 09:24:05AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote: > >> Just for the record: the release team had already expressed his view >> (in a sense): in Oct, there was already a (informal) discussion in >> #d-release, and the opinion was that this bug 295252 was not RC at all. > > However, the release team is also almost certainly going to defer to the > security team's judgement as to whether a given package is supportable in a > stable release, since it's the security team who ultimately has to do the > supporting. > > So in that sense, yes, it would be RC if the security team says it's RC. hi Steve I think that we are reaching an agreement Moritz said in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/12/msg00322.html that he thinks this bug should be RC, but that an exception should be made for Etch If everybody agrees, may someone in release team add a etch-ignore to that bug? a.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature