[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Renewed appeal to the technical committee about the FransAndCo.Vs.Sven dispute



Sven Luther writes ("Re: Renewed appeal to the technical committee about the FransAndCo.Vs.Sven dispute"):
> Well, i base this bias on the mails you wrote where you fully sided
> with frans in this issue, and against me. I think you did so more
> than once, altough i don't remember exactly.

Note that the TC makes decisions only as a last resort.  This means
that for any high profile question brought to the TC the TC members
are fairly likely to have seen prior discussion, formed an opinion,
and participated as individuals.

To recuse those TC members for this reason would be absurd.  Indeed,
the Constitution even says that TC members are expected to participate
in discussions before things get to the TC.

Obviously every TC member is expected to be receptive to the arguments
that are put forward, but that does not mean that they will
necessarily be convinced.

> [stuff]
>
> Well, he is indeed strongly doing so, going ad-hominem against me, for the
> sole reason that i am strongly pushing to get this issue resolved, while all
> others seem to prefer to drag it on forever.

ROTFL!  I wasn't going to reply to any more of this, but that's
hilarious enough it deserved highlighting.

Ian.



Reply to: