Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

To: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: sam@robots.org.uk, 350739@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:24:03 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060708092403.GG2818@mails.so.argh.org>
Reply-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, 350739@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <44AF732C.nailFVC1RY6ZR@burner>
References: <44AD7FF0.nail8EK11M37L@burner> <1152224952.5505.68.camel@xerces> <44AE4D17.nail8OT11A91C@burner> <[🔎] 20060707125710.GA21216@mails.so.argh.org> <44AE67EC.nail8QI28SU0R@burner> <[🔎] 20060707150751.GA2818@mails.so.argh.org> <44AE7D39.nail8SC15U8B9@burner> <[🔎] 20060708081446.GB2818@mails.so.argh.org> <44AF732C.nailFVC1RY6ZR@burner>

* Joerg Schilling (schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de) [060708 11:19]:
> As you are unable to prove your claims by quoting related parts of written
> down rules, you are obviously not trustworthy.

Please see Don's reply. It contains all useful information. Even though
you behave like a Kindergarte would be the right place for you, I'm not
doing total mouthfeeding for you now.

And BTW, I'm not interested to be considered anything by you or not.
You're just irrelevant.


Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images based on d-i technology (but not d-i).
Previous by thread: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
Next by thread: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread