Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

To: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: 350739@bugs.debian.org, sam@robots.org.uk
Subject: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:07:51 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060707150751.GA2818@mails.so.argh.org>
Reply-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, 350739@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <44AE67EC.nail8QI28SU0R@burner>
References: <44AD7FF0.nail8EK11M37L@burner> <1152224952.5505.68.camel@xerces> <44AE4D17.nail8OT11A91C@burner> <[🔎] 20060707125710.GA21216@mails.so.argh.org> <44AE67EC.nail8QI28SU0R@burner>

* Joerg Schilling (schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de) [060707 16:40]:
> Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote:
> 
> > Again: The CDDL fails to meet the DFSG. This is not a claim where CDDL
> > meets your standards or not, but it doesn't meet ours.
> 
> Prove that!

I'm sorry that you don't understand the Debian constitution and how it
works. Debian bodies make decision whether something qualifies debian's
standards or not.

[ Rest of stupid, incomprensive garbage deleted. ]

Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
Next by Date: Chair rotation
Previous by thread: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
Next by thread: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread