Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main"):
> What's so different between my own non-free program and my own non-free
> card which requires a non-free driver to work with ?
You didn't make the card.
(Unless you want to argue that ndiswrapper is for helping hardware
developers write their non-free drivers ...)
> And we need ndiswrapper because our users can't completely control the
> drivers that come with the hardware they have received or been given.
This is an absurd argument. In particular, it would suggest that any
non-free device driver should be allowed.
Ian.
Reply to: