On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 09:49:21AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Okay, Steve's meant to start today (in 20 minutes if we go by UTC), > so Ian are you happy to step down, and does everyone want to send in their > vote for new chair? > Mine's: 1. Steve, 2. Bdale, 3. Andy, 4. Raul, 5. Me, 6. Ian, 7. Further discussion So Ian's stepped down, and Steve has four votes, with three people not (yet) voting. Which either means we have a winner already, or will when voting closes. > > (1) Rotating the tech ctte chair > > - Feb 14th Ian Jackson > > Feb 15th - Mar 31st Steve Langasek > > Apr 1st - May 31st Bdale Garbee > > Jun 1st - Jul 31st Andreas Barth > > Aug 1st - Sep 30th Raul Miller > > Oct 1st - Nov 30th Anthony Towns > > Dec 1st - Jan 31st Ian Jackson > I vote yes... In favour: Steve, Ian, Anthony; no votes against -- so that's enough to pass when voting closes. > > (2) Requiring an implementation of proposals > > So I propose we establish a rule that we won't make decisions on issues > > that aren't ready for an immediate NMU when we make that decision. > Also yes... In favour: Steve, Anthony; Against: Ian -- currently that will pass, though won't be particularly binding. > > (3) Advisory opinions from the chair > > So I propose we establish that our procedure in addressing issues is > > for the chair to quickly issue an initial opinion; and to only vote on > > issues when an official ruling is needed (eg, to overrule a maintainer) > > or when members of the tech ctte disagree. > Also yes... Looks like we'll have an alternate mechanism from the incoming chair, so I'll change my vote to against, which gives us three against, none in favour. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature