Re: Ballot update (was Re: usr/man vs usr/share/man?)
> Raul> Also, note that we need to address all the problems with our proposed
> Raul> strategy.
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 10:49:38PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> In which case, really, we should advice that a major upgrade
> to slink be made with the updated versions of man, dwww, info, and
> any other packages that use /usr/share/doc, /usr/share/man, or
> /usr/share/info. The release notes for potato will recommend that anyone
> using a package from unstable first upgrade to the updated stable.
This doesn't have to be an upgrade to slink. This can be a dummy package
in potato which conflicts with the slink versions. The release notes
would then recommend that this dummy package be installed.
> Raul> At the moment I'm far more concerned about our other three
> Raul> members. I'm not sure if I should wait for them to comment
> Raul> and/or vote.
> Umm, we should be able to function even if some members are
> otherwise engaged (heck -- my vacation trips to India mean I'd be out
> for a month at a time)
> The minimum Quorum requirements have been met. And some of the
> members are definitely around (they voted for the chairperson).
Sure, quorum is 2. But without a majority any vote takes a week.
> I'd say that we may send them personal mail asking them to
> participate, but we should not draw this out much further.
Dale had indicated that he'd do this for me. But that was several
days ago -- perhaps it's time to do it again.