RE: Dependencies of linux-headers-<arch> packages
- To: "Moessbauer, Felix" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
- Cc: jan.kiszka@siemens.com <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, cedric.hombourger@siemens.com <cedric.hombourger@siemens.com>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>, debian-cross@lists.debian.org <debian-cross@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: RE: Dependencies of linux-headers-<arch> packages
- From: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:07:58 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 164690687809.4582.14647658228938650404@localhost>
- Mail-followup-to: "Moessbauer, Felix" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>, jan.kiszka@siemens.com <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, cedric.hombourger@siemens.com <cedric.hombourger@siemens.com>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>, debian-cross@lists.debian.org <debian-cross@lists.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] AM9PR10MB486990F0B2EA4BD1947775E1890B9@AM9PR10MB4869.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
- References: <[🔎] AM9PR10MB48690CC912740F47726A951D89049@AM9PR10MB4869.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <[🔎] 164631236959.3572389.15573746305449793283@localhost> <[🔎] AM9PR10MB4869C354D44BF5C0F7F6AECD890B9@AM9PR10MB4869.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <[🔎] AM9PR10MB486990F0B2EA4BD1947775E1890B9@AM9PR10MB4869.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Hi Felix,
Quoting Moessbauer, Felix (2022-03-10 11:02:44)
> > You cannot add :native to runtime dependencies. The :native qualifier only
> > makes sense for build dependencies. See
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchCross
> >
> > You can find the answer to your question in this thread:
> >
> > Essentially, linux-headers-* should depend on gcc-10-for-host:arm64
> > but that is blocked by us not having enough time to work on
> > https://bugs.debian.org/666743
>
> Ok, got it. But what about the workaround proposed by Ben Hutchings.
> Looks like this fixes the cross compiling, until #666743 is resolved.
> IMHO it is also a better workaround than just removing the dependencies as
> suggested in the mail thread.
if you can test Bens patch and the Linux maintainers are willing to apply it
then I guess you found a much simpler solution to your problem than #666743 :)
Thanks!
cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature
Reply to: