Re: Bug#929433: lintian: warn on suspicious usage of dpkg-architecture variables
> I think this tag would be more useful for maintainers preparing new
> packages, than for finding existing problems in the archive.
They could still be false-positives for new packages, no? As in, I'm
not really seeing your distinction here between fresh vs. existing
> How about emitting an info level tag when one of the less common
> dpkg-architecture variables is used, and proving some hints regarding
> the correct usage?
Mmm, but unless I'm missing something these could still have false-
positives too? Can you give some concrete examples for this so we
aren't talking too much in the abstract here?
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` email@example.com 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk