UNS: Mailing list administration (was: On the use of Git)

Subject: UNS: Mailing list administration (was: On the use of Git)
From: christoph@debian.org (Christoph Egger)
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:50:01 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87bp7y3z6e.fsf@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87eicu87by.fsf@gismo.pca.it> (sfid-20100916_094517_514461_CC72E87B) (Luca Capello's message of "Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:40:17 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 4C872DAF.50202@debian.org> <[🔎] 87eicu87by.fsf@gismo.pca.it>

Hi!

Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> writes:
> On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:31:11 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
>> PS: maybe we also need more 'admin' people for the mailing lists. Is
>>     someone a volunteer to do this?
>
> We need more, yes, especially given the fact that I am slowly fading
> away from CL-related stuff in Debian.  Christoph, Milan?

    Sure I'd do

Regards

    Christoph
-- 
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer

A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?

Reply to:

References:
- On the use of Git
  - From: pvaneynd@debian.org (Peter Van Eynde)
- Mailing list administration (was: On the use of Git)
  - From: luca@pca.it (Luca Capello)

Prev by Date: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)
Next by Date: Bug#592768: complementary information
Previous by thread: Mailing list administration (was: On the use of Git)
Next by thread: Mailing list administration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread