RFS: stumpwm (updated package)
- Subject: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)
- From: luca@pca.it (Luca Capello)
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:43:34 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 874odq876h.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTinSE+ROwUP+KyqxGE3-WXoRtN-gONx7V_WinrOB@mail.gmail.com> (Desmond O. Chang's message of "Tue, 24 Aug 2010 05:03:45 +0800")
- References: <AANLkTinma+Orz+czjnu_xkonKTeLErbfUQPAmhbHFCqo@mail.gmail.com> <1280991280.2834.95.camel@gismo.pca.it> <AANLkTi==dJ3YueH-dmCEUoH6furk_veT=90tybq8xUZu@mail.gmail.com> <1281561232.16702.169.camel@gismo.pca.it> <AANLkTimDzixLkyBaykuj+eRKMuytpSvR3yjs2MNuXD5k@mail.gmail.com> <1282079945.16702.1295.camel@gismo.pca.it> <AANLkTi=9wU4B=18j5_LQCWz2TtZL1S+j=UejysoXopZf@mail.gmail.com> <1282307806.18197.131.camel@gismo.pca.it> <AANLkTinSE+ROwUP+KyqxGE3-WXoRtN-gONx7V_WinrOB@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Desmond!
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:03:45 +0200, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 20:36, Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> wrote:
>> BTW2, please have a look at pristine-tar, we should import in the Debian
>> Git repository all the previous .orig.tar.gz in a pristine-tar branch,
>> so there will no need anymore for any .orig.tar.gz!
>
> Is it necessary for stumpwm? Since we pull the upstream repo directly.
Given that we upload to Debian *.orig.tar.gz (OK, .tar.bz allowed as
well), having the uploaded one in the VCS repository is IMHO a good
thing. Nevertheless, also given that StumpWM is your package, now, it
is your choice ;-)
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/attachments/20100916/804ee3e7/attachment.pgp>
Reply to: