Bug#568818: Not sure that the cl-swank problem is fixed?

Subject: Bug#568818: Not sure that the cl-swank problem is fixed?
From: pdm@debian.org (Milan Zamazal)
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:23:52 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87zl2hmbo7.fsf@blackbird.nest.zamazal.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1abe3fa91003091154r464e62c2yc84832b781d265a0@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20100309_205751_327578_65B57487) (A. J. Rossini's message of "Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:54:00 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 1abe3fa91003090026w334c3009la05d1b94c78fd11b@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 87r5ntopmr.fsf@blackbird.nest.zamazal.org> <[🔎] 1abe3fa91003091154r464e62c2yc84832b781d265a0@mail.gmail.com>

FWIW, slime works for me with sbcl 1:1.0.34.0-1.  And

  (require 'sb-bsd-sockets)

works in my sbcl prompt.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#568818: Not sure that the cl-swank problem is fixed?
  - From: blindglobe@gmail.com (A.J. Rossini)

References:
- Bug#568818: Not sure that the cl-swank problem is fixed?
  - From: blindglobe@gmail.com (A.J. Rossini)
- Bug#568818: Not sure that the cl-swank problem is fixed?
  - From: pdm@debian.org (Milan Zamazal)
- Bug#568818: Not sure that the cl-swank problem is fixed?
  - From: blindglobe@gmail.com (A.J. Rossini)

Prev by Date: Bug#568818: Not sure that the cl-swank problem is fixed?
Next by Date: Bug#568818: Not sure that the cl-swank problem is fixed?
Previous by thread: Bug#568818: Not sure that the cl-swank problem is fixed?
Next by thread: Bug#568818: Not sure that the cl-swank problem is fixed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread