[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [vagrant] issues with jessie64



Hi, 

On Mon Apr 25, 2016 at 19:47:40 +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
> Le 25/04/2016 19:19, Emmanuel Kasper a écrit :
> > Le 24/04/2016 17:46, Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit :
> >>> Please don't. I don't know what your use cases are, but nearly every
> >>> time I've used Vagrant, I needed a quick and ready-to-use OS
> >>> installation that could be easily thrown away. Of course some of the
> >>> packages you listed are probably won't ever used, but I completely
> >>> agree with Emmanuel: this is not a minimal image that doesn't even
> >>> comes with man pages.
> >>
> >> IFF we go that way, can we at least make sure that this image does not
> >> pull in pinentry-gtk2?  There is no need to pull in libraries for a GTK
> >> environment.
> > 
> > Ok this one is definitely a bug, since it has priority 'Optionnal' it
> > should not be there. I'll look into this.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Looked like we hit this bug:
> https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=jessie&package=mutt
> 
> and it goes:
> mutt -> libgpgme11 -> gnupg2 -> gnupg-agent -> pinentry-gtk2

why do we need mutt in an vagrant image?

-- 
 Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel@debian.org>    Debian System Administrator
 Debian & GNU/Linux Developer                       Debian Listmaster
 http://about.me/zobel                               Debian Webmaster
 GPG Fingerprint:  6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D  BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B 


Reply to: