[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cloud images on cdimage



Le 17/02/2016 00:08, Zied ABID a écrit :
>>> Hi Zied
>>> (removind -cd from thread)
>>> We don't have a wiki page or paragraph describing how to build and use
>>> the LXC Vagrant boxes maybe that would be a good point to start ?
>>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Ok for me, I'll begin with that ;)
> 
> I began a VagrantLXC page [1]. As I begin with documentation, please
> feel free to comment.
> 
> I was a little confusing to find the right place for including the page
> in a suitable parent page. Even when reading the main wiki cloud page
> [2], at least as Debian user, looking for an official image in the cloud
> is not "walk-trough", trying to build a private cloud on a Debian system
> or looking to contributing is better but too spread on the page.
> 
> What do you think about a clearer page with an architecture like:
> 
> 1. Using Debian in the Cloud
>         1.1 AWS EC2
>     1.2 Microsoft Azure
>     1.3 Google Compute Engine
>     1.4 Oracle Compute Cloud Service
>     1.5 RightScale
>         1.6 Others ..
>     1.7 Getting Help
>     1.8 Report a Bug
> 2. Create a cloud with Debian
>     2.1 Vagrant
>         2.1.1 VirtualBox
>             2.1.2 LXC
>     2.2 Docker
>     2.3 OpenStack
>     2.4 XCP/XEN
>     2.5 KVM
>     2.6 OpenNebula
>     2.7 Others ..
> 3. Building Debian images for the Cloud
>     3.1 Building Official Debian Image
>     3.2 Debian cloud tools
> 4. Contributing
>     4.1 Cloud Team
>     4.2 RoadMap/ToDo
> 
> 
> If you find the subject worthy, I'll begin a new thread to discuss more
> about this subject.
> 
> Cheers,
> Zied.
> 
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/VagrantLXC
> [2] https://wiki.debian.org/Cloud

Hi Zied

Without looking in your details in your index, I think you can just go
ahead and change things in the wiki if you go with caution.
Usually people are subscribed to the pages they care, and can revert if
they don't like the changes.
Everybody is free to edit that's a wiki !


Emmanuel





Reply to: