On 2014-05-01 13:04:46, Brian Gupta wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:49 AM, James Bromberger <james@rcpt.to> wrote: snip > I'll add that although it doesn't cost much to host AMIs, forcing our > users who are using unmodified AMIs to clone ours, to rely on them > being there, doesn't seem ideal. But it's a good practise to not to rely on external repos including AMIs. I'm not sure how fast we should remove AMIs but having AMI cloned into your own account when using it in production seams to be a way to go in my opinion. -- |_|0|_| | |_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" | |0|0|0| -------- kuLa --------- | gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature