On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:10:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 20:12 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 18:46 +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > We recently got FTBFS bug #598176 on gnome-do-docklets. This indicated > me to the fact that we still ship the `docky' theme in gnome-do. > > This functionality was branched out into a separate docky source > package some time ago. The package is currently in Squeeze. It's not > desirable to duplicate the functionality in this way. Upstream > recommends against it as well. > > It seems to me that the best way to resolve this is to patch docky out > of gnome-do and remove gnome-do-docklets. Is there an upgrade path from gnome-do-docklets to docky? (Assuming that upgrading users from the former to the latter makes sense, which it sounds like it does).It was pointed out to me that g-d-o and docky aren't in stable, so this is less of an issue. The diff looks okay; thanks.
Thanks, ACCEPTED into unstable just now. gnome-do 0.8.3.1+dfsg-2. Please unblock. Removal for -docklets will come soon. Cheers, Iain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature