Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:32:43AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> On 15-04-2020 22:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > autodep8-python3 PASS (superficial)
> superficial is translated to neutral. As is FAIL (flaky).
Hmmmm, what exactly means "superficial". Are all those
superficial? Do they qualify for early testing migration or not?
Wouldn't it be more informative to have a fourth category
My intention was to have a list with packages of our team where either a
test is missing or failing. My idea was that some autopkgtest-pkg-* is
"test is not missing". What is your opinion as debian-ci team about my