Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:32:43AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 15-04-2020 22:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > autodep8-python3 PASS (superficial)
>
> superficial is translated to neutral. As is FAIL (flaky).
Hmmmm, what exactly means "superficial". Are all those
Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-*
superficial? Do they qualify for early testing migration or not?
Wouldn't it be more informative to have a fourth category
pass
superficial
neutral
fail
My intention was to have a list with packages of our team where either a
test is missing or failing. My idea was that some autopkgtest-pkg-* is
"test is not missing". What is your opinion as debian-ci team about my
idea?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: