[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: autopkgtest for security archive

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:06:59PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
> On 14-04-2019 22:57, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 15372 March 1977, Paul Gevers wrote:
> >> b) If the access is indeed set-upped via IP whitelisting, than I have
> >> the following concern. We are currently running 12 amd64 workers in the
> >> AWS framework. I am typically recreating workers after 60 to 90 days as
> >> we are having issues with them after a while. This means they get new IP
> >> addresses. Would that be a problem? Soon I hope to also have arm64
> >> workers from another platform available. I expect similar issues there.
> > 
> > Thats bad, as yes, it is entirely via IP.
> We manage the instances via rake and our configuration is in git,
> available on salsa [1]. Does that help in any way, or can we think of
> something?

perhaps we could get a separate node to act as proxy (maybe even
the master node itself), and then we would only need to whitelist the
proxy instead of every (new) worker node.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: