I proudly present: first version of apt-release

[elbrus@debian.org (Paul Gevers)]

Hi Martin,

Thanks for the review.

On 17-09-17 21:37, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Can you please rebase your branch against
> master and squash related commits together? (Like defining an option,
> implementing it, and the corresponding test case).

I'll try to change it according to your comments.
> Indeed --apt-pocket and --apt-source are now quite different, I don't see how
> to efficiently merge them or reimplement --apt-pocket "on top of"
> --apt-source. But I think that's ok, as long as both have proper tests.

This is exactly why I appreciate your review. For me, looking at it
again after several months, I believed that this implementation is
better as it avoids the problem of differences between suites and code
names (which doesn't exist for Ubuntu).

Thanks again.

Paul

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/autopkgtest-devel/attachments/20170918/257e5bd3/attachment.sig>