[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

ci.debian.org and pkg-perl packages

On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:13:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello again,
> Martin Pitt [2014-09-09  8:04 +0200]:
> > Ah, good. I did that. I created https://titanpad.com/jQv06Sq0up to
> > coordinate this, I also added the command for the testing loop that I
> > use.
> I ran over 1.400 package tests on my laptop today (titanpad is up to
> date), and so far the results look rather promising. There are 168
> failures (https://people.debian.org/~mpitt/tmp/perl-failures/) and 94
> packages which don't have tests (at the end of the pad), i. e. which
> should be removed from the whitelist. That means that the other ~ 1150
> packages succeeded.
> If nobody else gets to it, I can run the second half of the batch
> tomorrow, and then produce the final source package lists for
> "passed", "failed", and "no tests", so that we can use the "passed"
> one as whitelist in ci.d.n.
> I haven't looked through the logs at all. It's very likely that
> there's some groups of related failures which can be fixed centrally
> in pkg-perl-tools, and then surely the long tail of individual
> failures.
> I suggest we start using the whitelist with the "passed" ones to avoid
> showing hundreds of new failures.

That is cool. FYI, I am collecting this stuff at


so please feel free to update the whitelists there directly. When all
this is ready to go live, there's where I will get the configs from.

Antonio Terceiro <terceiro at debian.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/autopkgtest-devel/attachments/20140909/e8220fed/attachment.sig>

Reply to: