[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[DEP 8] About "XS-Testsuite: autopkgtest": time to remove "XS-" ?



[ adding autopkgtest-devel to Cc: ]

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 12:36:38PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > FWIW, an old MBF about absent "Testsuite: autopkgtest" is at [1] and
> > looks halfway through completion. Some of the already resolved issues
> > were initially marked wontfix, but have then been corrected. Most of the
> > remaining bugs seem to be affecting zope-related packages and other zope
> > packages have been fixed already.
> 
> Perhaps rather than having another MBF, a better approach would be a
> lintian warning ?

Lintian is already aware of this, as mentioned by Niels:

  http://lintian.debian.org/tags/inconsistent-testsuite-field.html

but the tag is currently not a warning. Did you mean to suggest that we
ask the lintian maintainers to promote that tag to an actual warning?
FWIW, I'd welcome that.

Regarding the MBF, I didn't mean to propose another one. I was merely
pointing to the old one to observe its evolution over time.

Cheers.
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli  . . . . . . .  zack at upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o
Ma?tre de conf?rences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
Former Debian Project Leader  . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
? the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/autopkgtest-devel/attachments/20140103/bdf8e526/attachment.sig>


Reply to: