[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 关于kernel-source-2.6.8的疑问

Hi, "xi xi" <xixinxing@gmail.com> :

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:34:57 +0800
"xi xi" <xixinxing@gmail.com> wrote:

> aptitude install安装kernel-source-2.6.8,在/usr/src/下有个kernel-
> source-2.6.8.tar.bz2,解压后没有debian目录,应该是没有打上debian的patch.但如果apt-get source
> 的话,unpack有个debian目录,是不是apt-get source
> 得到的是kernel-source-2.6.8+kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8?

kanru@#debian-zh@irc.debian.org 给出的答案:

(15:10:52) kanru: (kernel-tree-2.6.8=vanilla)+kernel-patch-debian-2.6.8 == kernel-source-2.6.8

apt-get install xxx 拿到的是已经打过 Debian Patch 的包,
apt-get source xxx 是包含 Debian Patch 但没真正打的包(patch 在 debian 目录下)

A. Because it makes the logic of the discussion difficult to follow.
Q. Why shoudn't I top post?
A. No.
Q Should I top post?

A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation
Q: Why is it bad?
A: No, it's bad.
Q: Should I top post in replies to mailing lists? 

Reply to: