Re: ????woody.

[wen@japan.email.ne.jp]

jirong> > û´í,Õâ¸öÕ¾ÉϵÄwoodyÀïµÄÈ·ÓÐXFree86-4.0.xºÍkde,¶øÎÒÔÚÈÕ±¾ºÍÃÀ¹úµÄ
jirong> > Õ¾ÉÏûÕÒµ½.Èç¹û´Ówww.debian.org µÄÈí¼þ°üÉϼìË÷µÄ»°,ÄãÒ²»á·¢ÏÖËüÃÇ
jirong> > Ó¦¸ÃÔÚunstableÀï. ÊDz»ÊÇwww2.linuxforum.neÓÐÎÊÌâ? Ë­ÄܽâÊÍÒ»ÏÂ.
jirong> >
jirong> Maybe the server is old debian.
jirong> As I remember, woody ever had Xfree86-4.0 before.

Yeah, I think there is a mix-up between testing(woody) and unstable.
It seems there is not so difference between the current woody and potato.
I don't understand the definitely definition of woody and unstable. As a
developer, should he/she work in woody or unstable environment?

Wen