[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: removal of bg5cc and bg5ps



I can take over but I am not a debian developer.

I am preparing to apply as a debian developer for now.
Which direction I can do for now to help this ?

Yuan-Chen Cheng

On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 02:38:16PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 02:17:42AM +1300, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:14:41PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > > Hi Carlos and debian-chinese-big5
> > > 
> > > I'm currently looking over all packages owned by the Debian QA Group and
> > > request their removal if they don't seem to be usefull anymore. 
> > > 
> > > The packages bg5cc and bg5ps are currently orphaned and nobody
> > > volunteered to adpot them. These packages help processing big5 encoded
> > > text. As I know nothing about the big5 encoding and it's usefullness
> > > today, it is hard for me to judge if these packages should be removed or
> > > not. I have attached the research I've done so far. 
> > > 
> > > Please tell me if these packages are still usefull to you or if I can
> > > request their removal from Debian. If you would like them  to stay in
> > > Debian, we need a new maintainer for these two packages.
> > > 
> > I heard that someone want to adopt bg5cc and keep it in Debian archive.
> > It's still useful for people in Taiwan who just start to learn
> > programming.
> If someone is willing to adopt the packgae he/she should retitle Bug
> #189818. Unless this happens everything else are just rumors...
> 
> Do you have any names so I can directly contact this person?
> 
> Gaudenz
> 
> -- 
> Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
> Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
> ~ Samuel Beckett ~





Reply to: