[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RFC: Shall we make debian-chinese-* a subscribers-only list?



大家好,

鑑於近年來 Debian Chinese mailing lists 上有不少垃圾信,情況未有
改善的跡像,而也有多位過往的 debian-chinese-* 因受不住太多垃圾信
而退訂了。

因此,我想建議把 debian-chinese-* mailing lists 改為 "only subscribers
can post messages",而 non-subscribers 發送的信,則會先經由「版主」
處理。大家意見如何?  :-)

				東東

----- Forwarded message from Jaakko Niemi <listmaster@debian.org> -----

Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 05:21:00 -0500
From: Jaakko Niemi <listmaster@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Could we make debian-chinese-* a subscribers-only list?
To: Anthony Fok <anthony@thizlinux.com>
Cc: listmaster@debian.org

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Anthony Fok wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I was wondering if we could make debian-chinese-big5 and
> debian-chinese-gb subscribers-only lists?  There are way too many spam
> messages on those lists, and spamassassin isn't effective against the
> Chinese and Korean spams we regularly receive on the list.
> 
> If possible, it would be marvellous to implement the subscribers-only
> option, and for non-subscribers postings, you may send them to me (and
> perhaps to other Chinese Debian developers) for approval.
> 
> Please let me know what you think.  :-)

 This is possible, however the list software makes moderation almost
 unusable currently. 
 
 However general plan is to require one time confirmation for each
 non-subscriber who posts to our lists. This will be implemented after
 the listserver is upgraded to woody.

 Making a list restricted is possible, but requires consensus from
 the subscribers of that list. In that case discuss the issue on
 list, and file wishlist item against lists.debian.org when the
 matter is clear.


-- 

"And if the messenger would shoot first?"

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Anthony Fok Tung-Ling  霍東靈
ThizLinux Laboratory   <anthony@thizlinux.com> http://www.thizlinux.com/
Debian Chinese Project <foka@debian.org>       http://www.debian.org/intl/zh/
Come visit Our Lady of Victory Camp!           http://www.olvc.ab.ca/



Reply to: