Re: [i18n-chinese] zh_CN or zh_CN.GB2312 ??
I think zh_CN.GB2312 is ok, because it has contained enough information.
GB2312/GBK is implied.
This issue has been brought up in KDE I18N zh_CN team. I feel that
zh_CN.GB2312 is really ugly.
----- Original Message -----
From: <zw@zhaoway.com>
To: <i18n-chinese@egroups.com>
Cc: <debian-chinese-gb@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 12:12 AM
Subject: [i18n-chinese] zh_CN or zh_CN.GB2312 ??
> hi,
>
> i happened to notice that in /etc/gtk/ (debian woody helix-gnome)
> there is only gtkrc.zh_CN (by pablo from mandrake) but no zh_CN.GB2312,
>
> i suspect this should be changed? please advice. thanks.
>
> (the reason is that seems lots of packages/subsystem cannot
> agree with the locale names, like in current xemacs 21.1 + mule,
> and other places, ... which well just got me on the code i'm now
> writint... :(
>
。RP?€Dzf??y??b? ?猼蝚趁炮ぷn&坎??Z脫緉玕~濇劂 ?滆?nW?{Zr摡紱?蚴?-斜?抵?-
| This message was re-posted from debian-chinese-gb@lists.debian.org
| and converted from gb2312 to big5 by an automatic gateway.
Reply to: