Accepted linux-signed-i386 5.10.92+2 (source) into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:23:03 +0100
Source: linux-signed-i386
Architecture: source
Version: 5.10.92+2
Distribution: bullseye-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Changes:
linux-signed-i386 (5.10.92+2) bullseye-security; urgency=high
.
* Sign kernel from linux 5.10.92-2
.
* lib/iov_iter: initialize "flags" in new pipe_buffer
* [x86] mwifiex: Fix skb_over_panic in mwifiex_usb_recv() (CVE-2021-43976)
* [x86] drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store (CVE-2022-0330)
* [x86] drm/vmwgfx: Fix stale file descriptors on failed usercopy
(CVE-2022-22942)
* NFSv4: Handle case where the lookup of a directory fails (CVE-2022-24448)
* yam: fix a memory leak in yam_siocdevprivate() (CVE-2022-24959)
* tipc: improve size validations for received domain records (CVE-2022-0435)
* [s390x] KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest
(CVE-2022-0516)
* USB: gadget: validate interface OS descriptor requests (CVE-2022-25258)
* usb: gadget: rndis: check size of RNDIS_MSG_SET command (CVE-2022-25375)
Checksums-Sha1:
fe44754fa806f10219930e5978a6dedf65e10634 14257 linux-signed-i386_5.10.92+2.dsc
ff5545834c809f3864a3083ec5f36db76c23e752 3674148 linux-signed-i386_5.10.92+2.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
bf9ce69d52d94bd2ca1020398b21d9adff0019bc0ac3512a3557af42afd7490f 14257 linux-signed-i386_5.10.92+2.dsc
f3229fc491d6dae0ff00cd000e4ca9496c14dc874607c71bde5ea81d67a3ae20 3674148 linux-signed-i386_5.10.92+2.tar.xz
Files:
59b03e55395610db06992551db0d5438 14257 kernel optional linux-signed-i386_5.10.92+2.dsc
52da4ec7aa133eee4c62dda7f10616dc 3674148 kernel optional linux-signed-i386_5.10.92+2.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfKFfvHEI+gkU+E+di0FRiLdONzYFAmIdWccACgkQi0FRiLdO
NzbsLg//ajXwRc9F6qSZ4g+DzjpiaTemPG4o8O7GD/w0hcVXYR27bLN/gEA5PnNj
yCidqaU04aPm6ORO669mCsCYNl1dO9oR2s/ObkBFmPu5J7BBN0MAvrvU6RSHLUO9
GJ0n0M7+ckmjLmFR6BDRQe+cuXm3I5D3GF3PR3MOWiRz9CYvZ2dZGO5VgZj+DsBe
jPXWHPoE6yk5lG/HaTJydujK/EaEevW9zywYXUUvxKgtrURlvbcfF4I5G8ciMMy8
mFvYbPvelPHCc+JLnFBUbJKJVcr6q0g1QA7Bpr63+q8ExvAFGg3/8h3k/8wWsxyK
lZhGq2+9OdajKGc/4v8b/5K336/+lZ9hf5pNxHBrIxPO1OfWDuY6C+E8yGWxknGd
NzhKru07NH/ooWar0bNxWDOsmO1NJmkiakWAee9iN2X26uJ5Di18xtNVAlR39ogh
ZbbrQXsCgXkSAbvkKZcY+D9kQF0C8iLXRkCzoWzrYcmpW0Umw+JTNBbzoHtm5F0S
664hCXBWe/C0Q5ARoaWlk32JsJziaD50CkwmvFwZU9yjJlh0LfmN1URbRLsorfkB
AMltMzu4o2ADBY6bDsreFFw2wiWqcD0TwpbCT6IT2hpSTakGw+RYRuTBF8PC9RTf
rxDEQpvun7p9h2NIhKHxJa3zbZeO8pYO37tJ7uc9HvMXyFWzRVM=
=6usC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: