Accepted linux-signed-arm64 5.10.92+2 (source) into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:23:03 +0100
Source: linux-signed-arm64
Architecture: source
Version: 5.10.92+2
Distribution: bullseye-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Changes:
linux-signed-arm64 (5.10.92+2) bullseye-security; urgency=high
.
* Sign kernel from linux 5.10.92-2
.
* lib/iov_iter: initialize "flags" in new pipe_buffer
* [x86] mwifiex: Fix skb_over_panic in mwifiex_usb_recv() (CVE-2021-43976)
* [x86] drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store (CVE-2022-0330)
* [x86] drm/vmwgfx: Fix stale file descriptors on failed usercopy
(CVE-2022-22942)
* NFSv4: Handle case where the lookup of a directory fails (CVE-2022-24448)
* yam: fix a memory leak in yam_siocdevprivate() (CVE-2022-24959)
* tipc: improve size validations for received domain records (CVE-2022-0435)
* [s390x] KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest
(CVE-2022-0516)
* USB: gadget: validate interface OS descriptor requests (CVE-2022-25258)
* usb: gadget: rndis: check size of RNDIS_MSG_SET command (CVE-2022-25375)
Checksums-Sha1:
f75f91029350aceab9cc1aec65a6b210ae8f56cf 7332 linux-signed-arm64_5.10.92+2.dsc
cf0fda11f79ca10229f5d0864251940946634019 2472424 linux-signed-arm64_5.10.92+2.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
33dca75dc77551281a4a01a803953170b31f6cf1fef43dcf2bc44e39c2ecbb8a 7332 linux-signed-arm64_5.10.92+2.dsc
548163ce451c03e65b49ac2b3e762a7517d0f5c52c22c29911cfa725e9987fd4 2472424 linux-signed-arm64_5.10.92+2.tar.xz
Files:
3b5b70e867da10cb9b5706bedee8e26c 7332 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_5.10.92+2.dsc
9e05b1abb6a087f5dc4f6d29a8888f68 2472424 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_5.10.92+2.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfKFfvHEI+gkU+E+di0FRiLdONzYFAmIdMbMACgkQi0FRiLdO
Nzah+g/+Lg82MTzXECks9VijGts0RwdDfDuSBC2Dj73E1/YAiZi8Vd0FVpQadqSh
zV6ROMiwMd41lGmA/IyqCTiySUQFS9FvtgGKdMFy1yHS9EaSoeA54R4laNQxaZAk
eu1r0MMr2RkTqUjUfsIUo5wBq1f29ztJ/uJjPCWx6HIbRGkhcD9BKoQ+sWHAQ81s
F8/lrAH6Wqo1c/fc3BjAwdmXf5S+wkpYOZ5B3mWInFUi9NTczycDwQ93Otvl7R/1
LWrEQL+G9QSfUEb80C3pqqlHflg8145xQ6A5WkBgaS7cV8itrngAdsgm13NaTZAH
E/k4jDT/58VGcEVBLKhJYF/GiU3moshLW+y42yldAdHMLsGUU92SMMwGfS1l9z7D
ecI8bS8dNrLOhwoD66yitHe8FplLwO6iWcvmgqJdnZNJnKqcaJ02Cg9QBPTzISk2
YIBHrAct92PJOF3rxQpz4a/o19C4WpGusBUMU4KWIhfxlg4dqfhhsG+rC9UDNIJ+
CXDSihVQWe+pO40wuu6XacvJO8QHzN5y61XSGoPYRifTkNrLlsgPJ9PLt+bCW2EN
HPHe4Ot4K8FHOfLPkte7kc62+r4KkSRM4CgNCTMcILyfYgYNNKVGTUyRqKsqGumZ
Gv1EyN97YlqMyusrjFOqW1mXOR56YHGPiI4eH1ukrbs8awUVjrU=
=8lkd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: