Re: genscript-1.2.20-1 released
On Wed, 15 Nov 1995, Sven Rudolph wrote:
> Description: Converting ASCII texts to Postscript
> Genscript converts ASCII files to PostScript and stores generated
> output to a file or sends it directly to the printer.
Perhaps I'm in a nitpickey mood today, and perhaps I'm off base here.
Is the package name "genscript" taken from the upstream package name?
If not, is it a good name?
I think "genps", or some such name which is more suggestive of postscript
(as opposed to sed,awk,bash,sh,chs,... scripts) would be a better name.
However, if the upstream package is namad "genscript", I think it's
better to retain that (unfortunate) name than to change it.
Reply to: