Bug#865470: include debian-ports-archive-keyring on non released architectures
Control: tag -1 +pending
Hi!
Thanks for the patch. I've just applied it in git now...
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:15:45PM +0200, jhcha54008 wrote:
>Package: debian-cd
>Version: 3.1.20
>Tags: patch
>Severity: whishlist
>X-Debbugs-CC: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, James Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org>
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>Non released architectures from www.debian-ports.org need the archive
>keyring in the package debian-ports-archive-keyring (instead of the
>regular debian-archive-keyring). The patch below includes it in
>image-trees of the relevant architectures.
>
>Regards,
>JH Chatenet
>
>--- a/Makefile
>+++ b/Makefile
>@@ -66,6 +66,12 @@
> DEBOOTSTRAP_OPTS=--no-check-gpg
> endif
>
>+## Port architectures need their archive keyring
>+UNRELEASED_PORT_ARCHITECTURES=alpha hppa hurd-i386 m68k ppc64 powerpcspe sh4 sparc64 x32
>+ifneq (,$(filter $(UNRELEASED_PORT_ARCHITECTURES),$(ARCHES)))
>+export BASE_INCLUDE := $(BASEDIR)/data/base_include_port_architectures $(BASE_INCLUDE)
>+endif
>+
> ## Internal variables
> apt=$(BASEDIR)/tools/apt-selection
> check_backports_packages=$(BASEDIR)/tools/check_backports_packages
>@@ -392,7 +398,7 @@
> $(Q)if [ "$(SOURCEONLY)"x != "yes"x ] ; then \
> if [ _$(INSTALLER_CD) != _1 ]; then \
> for ARCH in $(ARCHES_NOSRC); do \
>- BINCLUDE=`[ -n "$(BASE_INCLUDE)" ] && cat $(BASE_INCLUDE) | tr "\n" "," | sed 's!,$$!!g'`; \
>+ BINCLUDE=`[ -n "$(BASE_INCLUDE)" ] && cat $(BASE_INCLUDE) | sort -u | tr "\n" "," | sed 's!,$$!!g'`; \
> [ -z "$$BINCLUDE" ] || BINCLUDE="--include=$$BINCLUDE"; \
> BEXCLUDE=`[ -n "$(BASE_EXCLUDE)" ] && cat $(BASE_EXCLUDE) | tr "\n" "," | sed 's!,$$!!g'`; \
> [ -z "$$BEXCLUDE" ] || BEXCLUDE="--exclude=$$BEXCLUDE"; \
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/data/base_include_port_architectures
>@@ -0,0 +1 @@
>+debian-ports-archive-keyring
>
>
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
< liw> everything I know about UK hotels I learned from "Fawlty Towers"
Reply to: