Re: Problem between priorities of libisofs6 and libjte1
Hi,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Apologies for not responding earlier - swamped with other stuff
I hope i showed the appropriate patience, given the low urgency
of the problem.
> ACK. I'll sort out a dependency change for libjte* shortly. It may
> take a few days to happen, as the priorities of packages are
> *actually* set via ftpmaster overrides.
(Now i have a new Debian term to look up. :))
Do you plan to promote libjte1 to "optional" ?
I downgraded libisofs-dev to "extra" in package VCS meanwhile.
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-libburnia/trunk/libisofs
To get into effect with the next release and sponsored package
upload.
But now i wonder why there is no complaint about mismatch of
libisofs-dev and libjte-dev on
https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=libisofs
Is it because in
https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/libi/libisofs/control-1.4.0-2
the package libisofs-dev has no libjte-dev in "Depends:" ?
libjte-dev only shows up in the "Source:" section.
Do i have to add libjte-dev to "Depends:" of libisofs-dev ?
(If so: why does it work without this since oldstable ?)
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
Reply to: