Re: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection (was: Beta1 missing decisions and possible timeline)
Hi Dann,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:38:31AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> There are still things to decide, and IMO consensus on this should be
>> reached soon!
>> - The naming of the etch+1/2 kernel meta packages is now suddenly essential
>> for the installer and should thus be decided on ASAP.
>> - There has as yet been no discussion about exactly which "Etch + Lenny D-I"
>> CD images to create and exactly what should be included on them [3].
>> (Hell, the whole "Etch + Lenny D-I" concept hasn't even really been OKed.)
>> Because of mirror space issues _and_ because of required preparations on
>> the debian-cd side this _really_ needs to be discussed with Sledge
>> urgently.
>
>Sledge et al, what's your take on the "Etch + Lenny D-I" concept for
>cd images?
>
>> [3] IMO we can do this only for selected arches, possibly only either
>> netinst CD + full CD _or_ netinst CD + DVD, and with sets limited
>> to only the first image.
>
>no strong opinion here (being familiar with neither their relative
>popularity, or the image building restrictions).
fjp and I just had a useful irc discussion to thrash out some of the
details - he's promised to mail pass them on by mail shortly. I'll
leave it to him :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"It's actually quite entertaining to watch ag129 prop his foot up on
the desk so he can get a better aim." [ seen in ucam.chat ]
Reply to: