Re: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection (was: Beta1 missing decisions and possible timeline)
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> There are still things to decide, and IMO consensus on this should be
> reached soon!
> - The naming of the etch+1/2 kernel meta packages is now suddenly essential
> for the installer and should thus be decided on ASAP.
> - There has as yet been no discussion about exactly which "Etch + Lenny D-I"
> CD images to create and exactly what should be included on them [3].
> (Hell, the whole "Etch + Lenny D-I" concept hasn't even really been OKed.)
> Because of mirror space issues _and_ because of required preparations on
> the debian-cd side this _really_ needs to be discussed with Sledge
> urgently.
Sledge et al, what's your take on the "Etch + Lenny D-I" concept for
cd images?
> [3] IMO we can do this only for selected arches, possibly only either
> netinst CD + full CD _or_ netinst CD + DVD, and with sets limited
> to only the first image.
no strong opinion here (being familiar with neither their relative
popularity, or the image building restrictions).
--
dann frazier
Reply to: