RE: BusyBox workaround
Would that be a 2nd "weekly" build, or would that be a daily build? I'll go
look and see if I can answer that myself.
Frans had suggested I do my testing from the Weekly's though I'm fine with
the daily in this case.
I also didn't know if there was some command I could issue from the 2nd tty
session during the install to pull down busybox-static or something which
would allow the build to progress normally.
From: Daniel Dickinson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: BusyBox workaround
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 14:02, Charles Abdouch wrote:
> Is there a way to manually get the missing package during the install and
> get it to continue?
This should be fixed for the 2007-12-18-1 snapshots and later. If not, it
will definitely be fixed in 18-2 (I'm not sure if the fix that allowed the
fix to propagate was early enough for 18-1 or not).
And that's my crabbing done for the day. Got it out of the way early,
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or
strangle cute bunnies or something. -- Michael Devore
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C http://gnupg.org
No more sea shells: Daniel's Weblog http://cshore.wordpress.com