Re: iceweasel & openoffice.org l10n
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:40:56PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 09:03:10AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> >[ Please keep me on CC! ]
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >I found this problem with the Multi-arch DVD, although it might affect
> >other (current or future) builds. Although iceweasel and iceweasel-l10n-*
> >packages have the same priority, turns out only iceweasel makes it to
> >the first DVD. The same situation happens with openoffice.org and its
> >openoffice.org-l10n-* packages.
> >
> >Is there any way to tell the debian-cd build scripts that iceweasel and
> >iceweasel-l10n-* should be allocated atomicaly? (later, if the scripts
> >decide the result belongs in the second DVD, we can always tweak that by
> >rising priority).
> >
> >Perhaps a Recommends would be able to handle this?
>
> A Recommends might help, or alternatively force things in the
> tasks. At the moment we only have a single set of tasks used for
> ordering all disc types, but maybe it's time to change that a little.
Should we open a BTS entry out of this?
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Reply to: