Bug#418195: netinst/bc: README contains para irrelevant
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 02:09:53AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 08 April 2007 01:25, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > I think we've grown too much to claim that anything after disc#1 is
> > just "special-interest". Is there better wording for this?
>
> Yes, I agree.
> Maybe: "It is unlikely that you will need all of the TOTALNUM disks in the
> set. The higher the number in the set, the less likely it is that you
> will use any of the packages that are included; higher-number images
> contain mostly special-interest programs."
FWIW, the CD FAQ has been saying for a while that the first two CDs are
enough:
You will probably only need the first DVD (or the first two CDs) unless
you have very special requirements.
<http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#which-cd>
But maybe these days even two CDs is not enough for a full desktop
install??
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key: 888354F7
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | 08A9 7B7D 3D13 3EF2 3D25 D157 79E6 F6DC 8883 54F7
¯ '` ¯
Reply to: