On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:43:33AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: >Steve McIntyre wrote: >> kdenetwork doesn't seem to have been updated on i386 beyond >> 2.2.2-14, while the other arches are on 2.2.2-14.6. Checking the >> changelog, I'm not sure if this is correct or not. There were no >> i386 packages to go on the CD, so none did. > >Unfortunately, the version in experimental causes the i386 package >to get rejected: > >Rejected: libmimelib-dev_2.2.2-14.6_i386.deb: old version (2.2-cvs20010503-1) in experimental <= new version (4:2.2.2-14.6) targeted at proposed-updates. >Rejected: libmimelib1_2.2.2-14.6_i386.deb: old version (2.2-cvs20010503-1) in experimental <= new version (4:2.2.2-14.6) targeted at proposed-updates. > >libmimelib-dev experimental 2.2-cvs20010503-1 i386 >libmimelib-dev stable 4:2.2.2-14 i386 >libmimelib-dev stable 4:2.2.2-14.6 alpha arm hppa ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc > >libmimelib1 experimental 2.2-cvs20010503-1 i386 >libmimelib1 stable 4:2.2.2-14 i386 >libmimelib1 stable 4:2.2.2-14.6 alpha arm hppa ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc Bugger. OK, we'll need to fix this for the next release. Should packages in experimental really be able to affect the rest of the archive in this way? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com We don't need no education. We don't need no thought control.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature