Re: More info on 3.0r1 update images
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:52:18PM +0100, Gianfranco Di Prinzio wrote:
>I readed the message about the update CD r0-r1 available via jigdo
>(http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2003/debian-cd-200301/msg00048.html).
>
>I made the CD with jigdo-lite for testing... but I have found some difference
>from the packages on this CD and those I downloaded using a script I made
>that finds new packages looking at previous CD and remote repository
>(like http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian and
>http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian-non-US).
>
>On the updated CD there are missing packages.
>How it was made this update image?
Using the update-cd script that comes in the debian-cd package. I went
through and made my own diff of what's available in r0 and r1, then
fed that into the script.
>Here some diffs from mine and the official on
> http://us.cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/3.0_r1/jigdo/i386/debian-update-3.0r1-i386.jigdo
>
>--- update-deb-jigdo.lst 2003-01-16 17:30:16.000000000 +0100
>+++ update-deb-script.lst 2003-01-16 17:30:34.000000000 +0100
>@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
> bugzilla-doc_2.14.2-0woody2_all.deb
> bugzilla_2.14.2-0woody2_all.deb
> caudium-php4_4.1.2-6_i386.deb
>+cedicttools_1.1-3.deb
> chill-2.95_2.95.4-11woody1_i386.deb
>+communicator_4.77-2_i386.deb
> courier-authdaemon_0.37.3-2.3_i386.deb
> courier-authmysql_0.37.3-2.3_i386.deb
> ...
> fetchmailconf_5.9.11-6.1_all.deb
>+freeswan_1.96-1.4_i386.deb
> g++-2.95_2.95.4-11woody1_i386.deb
> ...
> wwwoffle_2.7a-1.2_i386.deb
>+xanim-modules_2.80.1.15_all.deb
>+xcolmix_1.07-5_i386.deb
>+xezmlm_1.0.3-10_i386.deb
>+xfmail_1.5.1-3_i386.deb
> xinetd_2.3.4-1.2_i386.deb
>+xisp_2.6p1-6_i386.deb
>+xjdic_23-3_i386.deb
>+xplot_1.19-5_i386.deb
>+xwatch_2.11-8_i386.deb
> yaclc_1.3.6.1_i386.deb
>
>Is the update image truly correct?
>Or am I doing some mistake?
No, it looks like I made a mistake. All the missing stuff seems to be
in contrib. Which surprises me. Checking my diff now...
--
Steve McIntyre, Plasmon smcintyre@software.plasmon.com
Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/
Reply to: