Naming convention for official .jigdo files

[Richard Atterer <deb-cd@list02.atterer.net>]

Hi,

I noticed that the current naming scheme for .jigdo files will make it
impossible for users to tell whether they're downloading 3.0r0 or
3.0r1 unless they actually download the .jigdo file and let jigdo-lite
print the .iso name.

That's not ideal - maybe it would be better to use the same name stem
as for the iso files, e.g. "debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.jigdo"?

(...and also use "IndexOptions +NameWidth=40" or so for the Apaches on
[non-]us.cdimage so the whole name is displayed.)

Cheers,

  Richard

-- 
  __   _
  |_) /|  Richard Atterer     |  CS student at the Technische  |  GnuPG key:
  | \/¯|  http://atterer.net  |  Universität München, Germany  |  0x888354F7
  ¯ '` ¯


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org