Re: 3.0r1 iso images ready for testing
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 01:29:28PM +1000, jason andrade wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> None, really - I just tried to fit them into a small number of CDs
>> similar to the potato ones. It would be simple to generate separate
>> CDs (11) for each arch if people would prefer that...?
>my $0.02 is that it would be better to have a smaller ISO per arch
>as i think this results in less bandwith needed overall.
>it also means we can just drop each of the upgrade isos into the
>3.0_r1 tree, e.g
I'm just about there on creating these. It's quite a lot less
space-efficient, as binary-all will appear on all 11 binary discs and
it takes up ~54MB on each disc.
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. firstname.lastname@example.org
Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/