Re: 3.0r1 iso images ready for testing
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> None, really - I just tried to fit them into a small number of CDs
> similar to the potato ones. It would be simple to generate separate
> CDs (11) for each arch if people would prefer that...?
my $0.02 is that it would be better to have a smaller ISO per arch
as i think this results in less bandwith needed overall.
it also means we can just drop each of the upgrade isos into the
3.0_r1 tree, e.g