On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 10:24:07AM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote: > > Huh? The woody boot-floppies will do an even worse job installing sid > > than sarge. I'm not seeing why this is a show stopper? > I did not look onto that machine (which produces the CDs) for about a > month, but before that boot-floppies worked very well in case of SID. Yah, since then dpkg 1.10 has been uploaded which breaks dpkg as far as debootstrap is concerned (it now needs dselect) and there's a new base-config which wants aptitude. Using stable's b-f's to try installing testing or unstable is doomed to failure, basically. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Attachment:
pgpz1I79MdaL3.pgp
Description: PGP signature