On Sat, 2002-07-20 at 11:23, Philip Hands wrote: > OK, my current thoughts on CD image mirrors are that they should be laid > out as the current 2.2 CDs are, but that we might as well dump the > potato_test stuff, so we end up with: > > some.mirror.org/debian-cd/3.0_r0/alpha/MD5SUMS > some.mirror.org/debian-cd/3.0_r0/alpha/debian-30r0-alpha-binary-1.iso > ... > some.mirror.org/debian-cd/3.0_r0/arm > ... > some.mirror.org/debian-cd/3.0_r0/source/debian-30r0-source-1.iso I should have said, if you want to establish such a mirror, you'll need to use jigdo (probably jigdo-mirror) because I don't intend to have the images available as images from *.cdimage.d.o until after the start popping up in significant numbers on mirrors, because otherwise the unruly hoards of clueless ones will swamp us, and stop anyone getting at the jigdo snapshots etc.. When/if the CDs are made available on the master sites, all the CDs except the NONUS ones will be available on us.cdimage.debian.org (raff), while the NONUS CDs will be on non-US.cdimage.debian.org (open) Even then, I think we should standardise on jigdo-mirror or similar as the distribution mechanism. Waiting for the master mirrors to publish images, and then rsyncing the lot onto you server, will be frowned upon unless you seek prior approval. Cheers, Phil. -- Say no to software patents! http://petition.eurolinux.org/ |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part