Re: .raw extension is misleading
On 15 May 2002, Philip Hands wrote:
> I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of
> anything more appropriate.
>
> The reason not to call it simply "jigdo" is that the jigdo-area contains
> one or more versioned directories, each of which contains a jigdo and a
> snapshot directory, so having jigdo appear at two levels in the
> hierarchy seemed likely to give rise to confusion.
>
> I'm open to suggestions for a better name for where we keep
> jigdo/snapshot combinations, but I don't think "jigdo" is it.
jigdo-source
jigdo-base
isoimage
etc,
-jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: