Re: cvs commit of custom isolinux
> I would appreciate any details about ISOLINUX 1.72 or later failing
> where 1.67 succeeds. This is critically important, for obvious reasons.
Well, I don't have any, I just chose 1.67 following a conservative politic,
after all at 1.70 you had made "Major code restructuring" so I didn't know
how stable would 1.72 be. Besides, in the distro we are still at 1.66
version, I would have used this one but as 1.67 had a bugfix I chose that
one.
If you think that 1.72 works better than 1.67 let me know and if the other
agree we'll change it.
> 1.70 and .71 had serious, known, problems.
That's why I didn't want to go for 1.72, maybe some unknown problems were
still around, so I went conservative, that's all.
Regards...
--
Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: