Re: vanilla as default or not
Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 21:37, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> > Phil's argument that we consider the "vanilla" image default and so
> > should debian-cd is foolish IMHO.
>
> Well, it was more along the lines that "IF we consider vannalla default,
> then etc.", but since it's emerged that we don't, I'm completely OK with
> that, except perhaps that we need to do something about making sure that
> people grabbing the floppies could probably do with some hint that the
> stuff in the top directory might not be the best choice,
>
> Not that it will help most people --- If I'd not been part of this
> conversation, then I doubt I'd be reading the READMEs to see which my
> best bet was, I'd just grab the ones in .../current
Do you think it would be possible that we could provide CD image
labels for vendors, if they wanted to use them, which actually had the
names I suggested listed on the CD itself?
E.g.:
Debian 3.0, Intel x86
CD number 2 of 5
SCSI boot CD
I agree that users don't usually read and generally just pop in CD#1
and try to boot it.
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: