Re: Non-US or \"without Non-US\"?
my suggestion is
binary-i386.iso (w/NON-US progees)
binary-i386-us-exportable.iso (w/o NON-US progees)
i think that the population outside US is bigger than US, moreover, we
should consider US's policy as a kind of huh, exception policy, so that we
can probably make 'US' exception and not 'non-US' exception.
just my $0.02 :)
--
k h a o s * lamer
new name, new look, new ftp:
linuxxxxx.dyn.dhs.org (change FOUR letter)
upload something before downloading, or your class C IP banned.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn" <bug1@optushome.com.au>
To: "Antonio Paolini" <greene@wappi.com>
Cc: <debian-cd@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: Non-US or \"without Non-US\"?
> On Sat, 07 Jul 2001 23:37:08 +0000
> "Antonio Paolini" <greene@wappi.com> wrote:
>
> > My english is very bad, but i think the explanation in the FAQ is not
perfect.
> > I don't understand this; i'm italian. I need the binary-i386-1 or the
binary-i386 Non-US?
> >
>
> I think non-US is a bad name, im native english and i didnt understand it
when i first considered debian !
>
> "without non-US" is the distro with all the politically sensative programs
(e.g. crypto) removed.
>
> "Non-US" is the bit that can be added to "without non-US" to provide the
complete distribution.
>
> Its been mentioned before on -devel that they are bad names, but nobody
has thought of better ones.
>
>
> Glenn
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Reply to: