Re: Bug#93612: Support for new archive structure
Le Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:27:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
> Instead of changing the name of the Packages file, how about we try something
> completely different?
>
> dists/ woody-secured/
[...]
> That should be pretty easy to do right now, and shouldn't cause any
> problems to anyone, right? All you're doing is creating a new directory
> that no one has to look at, and adding a Release file in dists/woody/
> that'll make debootstrap work.
That's the best solution at the moment. I'm going to implement it.
> So anyway, how does the above idea (two woody trees in dists),
> sound? Workable, or are there other problems?
I don't see any apart from the fact that most tools will use
stable symlink which still points to woody. That means that apt-cdrom
must learn about woody-secured (give it precedence over woody) when
looking in the CDs. I can create symlinks "stable-secured" and so on if
required.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/
Le bouche à oreille du Net : http://www.beetell.com
Naviguez sans se fatiguer à chercher : http://www.deenoo.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
Reply to: