[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: regarding potato images

Jim Westveer <jwest@netnw.com> writes:

> On 01-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Um, I thought it went like this for i386:
> > 
> >  CD#1: vanilla kernel
> >  CD#2: compact
> >  CD#3: idepci
> #1 & #2 correct, for potato, i386, CD#3 has no boot blocks.
> It (CD#3) probably should be modified to have a boot image.
> I'll take a look at it.  Just the boot blocks do not take
> much space.  If it will fit, we probably should put idepci
> on CD#3.  Thoughts ???  

Yes, I agree.

.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply to: